GBS Claims – Investigations and the importance of experts

21st December 2017

We previously commented on the initial steps in commencing a legal claim specific to claims involving Group B Strep infection and the considerations at the very earliest stages.

From the lawyer’s perspective, giving an accurate assessment of the merits of a claim at the outset can be difficult.   As with any claim for clinical negligence we need to identify where treatment has fallen below a reasonable standard (i.e a breach of the duty of care) and that this has caused or materially contributed to an injury.  There is therefore a threefold requirement of establishing breach ,  causation and injury. Without all three components, a claim will fail.

The initial instructions may not in themselves, clarify those issues and the lawyer’s role is often to provide the answers that the parents have been denied.  It may not be possible to identify where a breach  of duty has occurred and a hospital’s own inveownstigation may itself be inconclusive.

To that end once the appropriate medical records have been obtained, the choice and instruction of the correct experts is crucial.

By way of example, consider the case of a baby who died from GBS sepsis a few days after birth.  The parent’s initial concerns were that whilst GBS infection had been noted early in the pregnancy and it had been intended to administer intravenous Antibiotics at the time of the labour, this had not been done.

Whilst there appeared to be a breach of duty in failing to administer antibiotics, the very  poor condition that the baby was born in raised a concern that the infection itself may have been well established and the baby may not have survived in any event. Antibiotics do not have an immediate effect and if this is not in sufficient time to prevent sepsis then we would not be able to establish sepsis.

To consider breach, an obstetrician and gynaecologist was instructed to assess the management of the pregnancy and labour.  In his report, he identified a criticism that neither the hospital or the parents had considered which was that in an attempt to induce labour an excessive number of stretch and sweeps had been performed.

A stretch and sweep is a process whereby a gloved finger is inserted into the cervix in an attempt to separate the amniotic sac membranes from the lower part of the uterus. This action can trigger the release of hormones and can start labour and is a routine procedure but, in our client’s case this was unsuccessful.

In a patient with known GBS colonisation, there is a theoretical risk that a stretch and sweep can introduce GBS into the uterus from the vagina and infect the fetus. For a single sweep this risk is acceptable in the interests of prompting labour, however in the context of multiple sweeps, it is not, particularly where there are alternative methods of prompting labour which do not carry such a risk i.e. prostaglandin gel.

A further report was obtained from  a microbiologist who confirmed that the infection was transmitted to the fetus before birth , probably from the unnecessary , additional stretch and sweeps.

In such circumstances we were able to establish that there had been a breach of duty and that without the breach of duty, the infection which ultimately led to the babies death was avoidable.

It is therefore important to consider all aspects of the management both before, during and after the labour and not to focus on what may be the initial concerns.  Claims for medical negligence often evolve as the case progresses and with cases involving infection, where there may be underlying and unrecognised processes afoot, careful expert instruction and an open mind are crucial.



Further Reading…

The duty of candour – slow and steady progression

23rd October 2018

By Andy Tindall, Litigation Executive in the Medical Negligence team After the publication of AVMA’s report on the inspection and regulation of the duty of candour earlier this month, the…

A day in the life of a trainee solicitor

23rd October 2018

By Chloe Westwell, trainee solicitor No two days are ever the same at Fletchers Solicitors. Currently, I am working in the Litigation Team in the Clinical Negligence Department which is…

Take the first step now, you have nothing to lose

  • Top Ranked Leading Individual - Chambers UK 2016
  • The Sunday Times Top 100 - Best Companies To Work For 2016
  • The Lawyer UK200 - Listed Firm 2015
  • The Law Society - Clinical Negligence
  • The Legal 500 - Leading Firm 2015
  • The Investors In People Awards 2016 - Winner
  • IIP - Investors in People
  • Lexcel - Excellence in Legal Practice Management and Client Care
  • sia - Spinal Injuries Association
  • MASS - Motor Accident Solicitors Society
  • Apil - Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Headway - The Brain Injury Association
  • avma - Action Against Medical Accidents
  • Backup Trust - Transforming Lives After Spinal Cord Injury
  • Child Brain Injury Trust
  • Cyber Essentials
Any Questions?

We know that making a claim can raise a few questions, here are some of the ones we get asked most often.

Read our FAQs

Contact Details
03300 080 321
Dukes House, 34 Hoghton Street, Southport, PR9 0PU
St James's Tower, 7 Charlotte Street, Manchester, M1 4DZ
Map of the UK