Latest information on Coronavirus (COVID-19)

Learn More

Mother compensated for physical and mental pain following forceps birth delivery

23rd April 2019

A mother has received £130,000 as a medical negligence settlement after the hospital that delivered her baby using forceps resulted in years of physical and mental pain. 

The claimant, 33, who wishes to remain anonymous, received her settlement monies after it was alleged that a Mediolateral Episiotomy should have been performed during child birth instead of a Midline Episiotomy.

The Claimant alleged that to perform a midline Episiotomy increased the risk of a fourth degree tear significantly and unfortunately, the Claimant suffered the same.

The Defendant, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust denied that a midline episiotomy was performed and that if the same was, they deny such was negligent.

Medical Negligence Solicitor, Georgina Tither who represented Mrs B said:

“Having worked with Mrs B over a number of years and understanding the severe extent of her injuries as a result of the hospital negligence, I was extremely happy to secure her a settlement.

“A settlement which we know will not put her back to her pre-negligence position but I hope will assist Mrs B in moving on from what has happened.”

On 25 January 2013, at 7am the claimant, Mrs B was admitted to Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in early labour at 39+3 weeks.

Mrs B was noted to have Gestational Diabetes and 9cm dilated.

At 20.40, Mrs B’s membranes were ruptured and at 23.10, Mrs B started pushing.

At 00.36, Mrs B’s baby was delivered by forceps, with an episiotomy (surgical cut) being required, but Mrs B suffered a fourth degree tear allegedly as a result of the incision made.

The Defendant has been found negligent in performing a midline Episiotomy repair to Mrs B’s fourth degree tear.

It has since been confirmed that a Mediolateral Episiotomy should have been performed instead, directing any tear away from the anal sphincter.

Medical experts who assessed Mrs B’s case deemed that there is a higher risk to the patient in performing a midline Episiotomy.

As a result of the action taken by the defendant, Mrs B suffered irreparable physical and mental damage, including:

Doubly Incontinent, requiring the Claimant to wear pads and have fear of leaking when out of the house.

Void Dysfunction causing recurrent water infections.

Pain during sexual intercourse ultimately leading to a breakdown in her marriage.

Adjustment Disorder mixed with anxiety and depressed mood (moderate to severe range) as stated by DSM-V caused by leaking and accidents from incontinence.

Unable to engage in previous hobbies and employment.

Likely requirement for future surgery to relieve symptoms.



Further Reading…

Two Notable Black British Individuals

26th October 2020

This October, Fletchers Solicitors is celebrating Black History Month by highlighting influential Black people who have helped shape the world we live in today. We’ve assigned a cross-departmental team across…

You don't have to go through this alone - take the first step now

  • IIP - Investors in People
  • The Sunday Times Top 100 - Best Companies To Work For 2016
  • The Investors In People Awards 2016 - Winner
  • The Legal 500 - Leading Firm 2015
  • The Law Society - Clinical Negligence
  • The Lawyer UK200 - Listed Firm 2015
  • Top Ranked Leading Individual - Chambers UK 2019